la_vie_noire: (Stop with the idiocy)
la_vie_noire ([personal profile] la_vie_noire) wrote2011-02-26 03:13 am

Natsuo Kirino, Out

Yes. I'm also pissed because I looked for this book for an eternity; I bought it here, in Spanish; and it was EXPENSIVE.

What the shit. No seriously, what the shit.

I mean, sure, great social critique and insight into Japanese working class and economical issues. But seriously, I can't remember the last time a book made me feel to icky.

What the shit? So, you have this woman who is smart, cold, has agency, but that immediately makes her better than any other woman character in the book who isn't like her; even if it's shown they all are oppressed women. And The Woman is specially superior to those who are fat and ugly. And also she is wanted by every man, specially by the... sadist rapist who, by the book's standards, is more sympathetic than the fat and frivolous co-worker. Actually, the book makes the sadist, icky killer the pseudo "love interest." For a book that is supposed to be "feminist," it's something that the woman who killed her abusive, unfaithful husband in a rage attack for his abusive behavior is regarded in a worse way than the man who killed and tortured a prostitute for pleasure. Just because he "sees himself as corrupted." Right.

Ugh. Ugh. Fuck you, book. I thought you were better than that.

Also, I'm kinda tired of reading stupid shit on facebook. God, I can't make myself away from it due to having a lot of my real life there, but how much I wish it every time politic issues are mentioned. Stupid, stupid privileged assholes.
eccentricyoruba: (cool hat)

[personal profile] eccentricyoruba 2011-02-26 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
I admit, I enjoyed reading Out the first time. All your concerns are valid and I guess I chose to ignore them because I badly wanted the book to be something that it wasn't. Against odds, I felt sympathetic with the fat and frivolous co-worker. I still don't get why the sadistic rapist killer was a "love-interest".
eccentricyoruba: (tropiques amers)

[personal profile] eccentricyoruba 2011-02-27 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
I was actually there waiting for her to look good in any way, but it never came.

I just imagined she was there to show how myopic the other women actually were?

I meant I don't get why the book went for that. I don't know if it is arguable...you're right Matsuko wanted to be freed while to him, she was like "the one". And according to the book, even though Matsuko knew she was in danger, she still wanted that "freedom" that would only come violently. His death and the ending of the book suggested that Matsuko really felt sorry for the sadistic dude. Like she needed him in some way or the other and was sorry she killed him.

The Brazilian immigrant was alright. What do you think about the book's handling of immigration and race? There was another character that amused me, the man who was behind Matsuko starting the business. I don't remember his name but I always imagine him in a suit.
Edited 2011-02-27 00:24 (UTC)
eccentricyoruba: (Default)

[personal profile] eccentricyoruba 2011-02-27 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, also she showed more for him than for the consumerist co-worker, or even her own family.

Which was just weird but was written away as Matsuko possessing something special.

I totally forgot about him sexually attacking Matsuko. And his name is Jumonji? And he treated Kuniko like shit? I think I need to reread Out, if possible, quite a few problematic issues seem to sailed over my head.