OH. So that's where it came from! XDD

Well, it makes sense that people called it 'moral relativist,' but... I still don't agree. (But I understand it now! XD;;)

You see, we aren't in a universe where moral is relative (I'm talking about Holic's universe of course XD), where things you do doesn't have a impact that has a... solid moral resonance?

I mean, in the end Yuuko is still the moral authority, she dictates what is right and what is wrong. She said moral varies from individuals and you have to accept it because what she says is absolute. XDD

And really, by Holic and by the way Yuuko judges her clients, I would say that that 'difference between individuals' doesn't escape an universal judgment. I think, in the end, what is bad or good for one person is still subjected to XXXholic's moral, even if it can change (it can vary from person to person, but for an specific person in an specific situation? That's the moral absolute). It's not like moral relativism where there is NO judgment, and you can't make moral conclusions because it's so... relative.

Damn, this is so interesting. I love this subject. (... yeah, I'm weird.)